Order II Rule 6: Power of Court to order separate trials

Questions on this rule

1 question in 3 of our papers cite Order II Rule 6. Try these from the free papers:

1. 1. In Prem Lala Nahata v. Chandi Prasad Sikaria (2007), the defendant sought rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, contending that the suit was bad for misjoinder of plaintiffs and of causes of action. The Supreme Court held that:

   A.the plaint must be returned under Order VII Rule 10, to be presented as separate suits before the proper CourtsB.a suit bad for misjoinder is not one "barred by any law", so the plaint cannot be rejected under Rule 11(d) on that groundC.the plaintiffs must be put to their election at once, failing which the whole suit stands dismissed for defaultD.misjoinder of causes of action makes the suit barred by law, so the plaint must be rejected with liberty to sue separately
   Show answer