Law Maker

THE FIRST SCHEDULE · ORDER VI Pleadings generally

Order VI Rule 17: Amendment of pleadings

The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

1[The Court may at any stage of the proceedings allow either party to alter or amend his pleadings in such manner and on such terms as may be just, and all such amendments shall be made as may be necessary for the purpose of determining the real questions in controversy between the parties:

Provided that no application for amendment shall be allowed after the trial has commenced, unless the Court comes to the conclusion that in spite of due diligence, the party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Subs. by Act 22 of 2002, s. 7, for rules 17 and 18 (w.e.f. 1-7-2002).

Questions on this rule

5 questions in 18 of our papers cite Order VI Rule 17. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Which of the following orders are appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC? 1. An order under Order XXXIII Rule 5 or Rule 7 rejecting an application for permission to sue as an indigent person. 2. An order under Order XL Rule 1 appointing a receiver. 3. An order under Order XLI Rule 19 refusing to re-admit an appeal dismissed for default. 4. An order under Order VI Rule 17 refusing leave to amend a pleading. Select the correct answer:

  2. 2. In Haramani Sahoo v. Lalita Nayak (12 October 2026), the plaintiffs applied, after the trial had begun, to amend the plaint to challenge a compromise decree that they said they had discovered later. The defendants objected that the new relief was time-barred. The Supreme Court:

  3. 3. In Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Ladha Ram & Co. (1976), the defendants sought to amend their written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC so as to withdraw a clear admission made in it and set up an entirely new case. The Supreme Court held that:

Practise questions on Civil Procedure Code