CHAPTER V Appointment of Rent Controlling Authorities, their Powers, Functions and Appeals
The Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961
This is the text of the Act as it stood in undivided Madhya Pradesh before 1 November 2000, as published by India Code in its Chhattisgarh collection. India Code has no copy filed under Madhya Pradesh.
Square brackets mark words inserted or substituted by later amending Acts. This copy has no footnotes naming those Acts or their dates.
The Madhya Pradesh Vidhan Sabha lists of Acts passed from 2014 to 2026 show no Act amending this Act, and the Madhya Pradesh Jan Vishwas Acts of 2025 do not touch it. No official list of Acts for 2000 to 2013 could be checked. In September 2026 the Madhya Pradesh High Court quoted Section 23-J in the same words as this copy.
The Madhya Pradesh Parisar Kirayedari Adhiniyam, 2010 (Act No. 16 of 2012) repeals this Act from a date to be notified. The Madhya Pradesh High Court recorded in 2017 and 2018 that it had not been notified, and the High Court continues to apply this Act in 2026.
Raipur, Durg and the other Chhattisgarh areas named in the text and the First Schedule have been part of Chhattisgarh since 1 November 2000. References to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 and the Indian Penal Code, 1860 are printed as in the original.
This copy does not print the long title, the enacting formula or the date of assent.
Clauses (a), (c) and (d) of Section 29(1) are printed incomplete in this copy and are reproduced as printed.
The First Schedule and the Notifications are shown as printed in this copy and may not include later notifications extending the Act to other areas.
A second appeal shall lie against any order passed in first appeal under Section 31 on any of the following grounds and no other, namely:
(i) that the decision is contrary to law or usage having the force of law; or
(ii) that the decision has failed to determine some material issue of law; or
(iii) that there has been a substantial error or defect in the procedure as prescribed by this Act, which may possibly have produced error or defect in the decision of the case upon merits.