Law Maker

Chapter III Regulation of Letting

Section 12: Deemed vacancy of building in certain cases

The Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (repealed)

Repealed in Uttar Pradesh by section 46(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021 (U.P. Act No. 16 of 2021), deemed in force from January 11, 2021, which provides that this Act "is hereby repealed", while section 46(2) keeps cases pending under it at that commencement to be decided under this Act.

How current this text is

Text as published by India Code for this Uttar Pradesh Act in its Uttarakhand collection (Department of Urban Development, file urban_buildings_(1).pdf), with amendments up to U.P. Act No. 17 of 1999; India Code has no Uttar Pradesh copy of this Act.

This Act was repealed in Uttar Pradesh by section 46 of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, which saves the cases pending under it at the commencement of that Act; it is shown here for those cases and for study.

Amendments made by Uttar Pradesh after U.P. Act No. 17 of 1999, if any, are not shown in this copy.

The copy is a typed edition and its typing errors (for example "licnece" in the heading of section 2-A) are reproduced as printed.

Sections 24-A, 24-B and 24-C carry no marginal heading in this copy.

Marginal references to other enactments (for example "U.P. Act no. II of 1959") printed beside the text are not reproduced.

In Inder Bhushan Sawhney v. Kanchan Kumari Jain (Writ-A No. 13349 of 2024, 2026:AHC:177234-DB, decided on 21 August 2026), the Allahabad High Court, declaring parts of the 2021 Act ultra vires, held that this Act "would spring back to life, of its own to the extent required".

(1) A land lord or tenant of a building shall be deemed to have ceased to occupy the building or' part thereof if-

(a) he has substantially removed his effects therefrom, or

(b) he has allowed if to he occupied by any person who is not a member of his family, or

(c) in the case of a residential building, he as well as members of his family have taken up residence, not being temporary residence, elsewhere.

(2) In the case of a non-residential building, where a tenant carrying on business in the building admits a person who is not a member of his family as a partner or a now partner , as the case may be, the tenant shall be deemed to have ceased to occupy the building.

(3) In the case of a residential building if the tenant or any member of his family builds or otherwise acquires in a vacant state or gets vacated a residential building in the same city, municipality, notified area or town area in which the building under tenancy is situate, he shall be deemed to have ceased to occupy the building under his tenancy:

Provided that if the tenant or any member of his family had built any such residential building before the date of commencement of this Act, then such tenant shall be deemed to have ceased to occupy the building under his tenancy upon the expiration of a period of one year from the said date.

[Explanation— For the purposes of this sub-section :--

(a) a person shall be deemed to have otherwise acquired a building,, if he is occupying a public building for residential purposes as a tenant, allottee or licensee;

(b) the expression ‘any member of family’ in relation to a tenant, shall not include a person who has neither been normally residing with nor is wholly dependent on such tenant.]1

[(3-A) If the tenant of a residential building holding a transferable post under ay Government or local authority or a public sector corporation or under any other employer has been transferred to some other city, municipality, notified area or town are, then such tenant shall be deemed to have ceased to occupy such building with effect from the thirtieth day of June following the date of such transfer or from the date of allotment to him of any residential accommodation (whether any accommodation be allotted under this Act or any official accommodation is provided by the employer) in the city, municipality, notified area or town area to which he has been so transferred, whichever is later.

(3-B) If the tenant of a residential building is engaged in ay profession, trade, calling or employment in ay city, municipality notified area or town area in which the said building is situate and such engagement ceases for any reason whatsoever and he is landlord of nay other building in any other city, municipality, notified are or town area, then such tenant shall be deemed to have ceased to occupy the first mentioned building with effect from the date on which he obtains vacant possession of he last mentioned building whether as a result of proceedings under section 21 or otherwise.]2

(4) Any building or part which a landlord or tenant has ceased to occupy within the meaning of sub-section (1), or sub-section (2), or [sub-section (3) sub-section (3-A) or sub-section (3-B)]3 shall, for the purposes of this chapter, be deemed to be vacant.

[(5) A tenant or, as the case may be, a member of his family, referred to in sub-section (3) shall have a right, as landlord of any residential building referred to in the said sub-section which may have been let out by him before the commencement of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) (Amendment) Act, 1976 to apply under clause (a) of sub-section (1) of section 21 for the eviction of his tenant from such building, notwithstanding that such building is one to which the remaining provisions of this Act do not apply.]4

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Added by section 7(i) of U. P. Act No. 28 of 1976.
  2. 2.Added by section 7 (ii) ibid.
  3. 3.Substituted by section 7(iii) of U. P. Act No. 28 of 1976.
  4. 4.Added by section 7 (iv) ibid.

Practise questions on Uttar Pradesh Local Laws