Law Maker

Chapter III Regulation of Letting

Section 16: Allotment and release of vacant building

The Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (repealed)

Repealed in Uttar Pradesh by section 46(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021 (U.P. Act No. 16 of 2021), deemed in force from January 11, 2021, which provides that this Act "is hereby repealed", while section 46(2) keeps cases pending under it at that commencement to be decided under this Act.

How current this text is

Text as published by India Code for this Uttar Pradesh Act in its Uttarakhand collection (Department of Urban Development, file urban_buildings_(1).pdf), with amendments up to U.P. Act No. 17 of 1999; India Code has no Uttar Pradesh copy of this Act.

This Act was repealed in Uttar Pradesh by section 46 of the Uttar Pradesh Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, which saves the cases pending under it at the commencement of that Act; it is shown here for those cases and for study.

Amendments made by Uttar Pradesh after U.P. Act No. 17 of 1999, if any, are not shown in this copy.

The copy is a typed edition and its typing errors (for example "licnece" in the heading of section 2-A) are reproduced as printed.

Sections 24-A, 24-B and 24-C carry no marginal heading in this copy.

Marginal references to other enactments (for example "U.P. Act no. II of 1959") printed beside the text are not reproduced.

In Inder Bhushan Sawhney v. Kanchan Kumari Jain (Writ-A No. 13349 of 2024, 2026:AHC:177234-DB, decided on 21 August 2026), the Allahabad High Court, declaring parts of the 2021 Act ultra vires, held that this Act "would spring back to life, of its own to the extent required".

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, the District magistrate may by order-

(a) require the landlord to let any building which is or has fallen vacant or is about to fall vacant, or a part of such building but not appurtenant land alone, to any person specified in the order (to be called an allotment order); or

(b) release the whole or any part of such building, or any land appurtenant thereto, in favour of the landlord (to be called a release order) :

[Provided that in the case of a vacancy referred to in sub-section (4) of section 12, the District Magistrate shall give an opportunity to the landlord or the tenant, as the case may be of showing that the said section is not attracted to his case before making an order under clause (a).]1

(2) No release order under clause (b) of sub-section (1) shall be made unless the District Magistrate is satisfied that the building or any part thereof or any land appurtenant thereto is bona fide required, either in its existing form or after demolition and new construction, by the land lord for occupation by himself or any member of his family, or any person for whose benefit it is held by him, either for residential purposes or for purposes of any profession, trade, calling or where the landlord is the trustee of a public charitable trust, for the objects of the trust, or that the building or any part thereof is in a dilapidated condition and is required for purposes of demolition and new construction, or that any land appurtenant to it is required by him for constructing one or more new buildings or for dividing it into several plots with a view to the sale thereof for purposes of construction of new buildings :

Provided that no application under this sub-section shall be entertained for the purposes of a charitable trust the objects of which provide for discrimination in respect of its beneficiaries on the ground of religion caste or place of birth.

(3) The allotment order shall specify--

(a) whether the building shall be used by the tenant for residential or non-residential purposes ;

(b) in the case of business purposes, the names of proprietors or partners of the business;

(c) the date, which shall not be earlier than seven days after the date of the order, by which the landlord shall deliver possession to the allottee ;

(d) such other particulars as may be prescribed.

(4) Where the allottee or the landlord has not been able to obtain possession of the building, allotted to him or, as the case may be, released in his favour, or any part thereof, [***]2 the District Magistrate, on an application of the allottee or the landlord, as the case may be, may by order evict or cause to be evicted any person named in the order as well as every other person claiming under him or found in occupation, and may for that purpose use or cause to be used such force as may be necessary and put or cause to be put the allottee or the land-lord in possession of the building or part.

(5) (a) Where the landlord or any other person claiming to be a lawful occupant of the building or any part thereof comprised in the allotment or release order satisfies the District Magistrate that such order was not made in accordance with clause (a) or clause (b), as the case may be, of sub-section (1), the District Magistrate may review the order:

Provided that no application under this clause shall be entertained later than seven days after the eviction of such person.

(b) Where the District Magistrate on review under this sub-section sets aside or modifies his order of allotment or release, he shall put or cause to be put the applicant, if already evicted, back into possession of the building, and may for that purpose use or cause to be used such force all may be necessary.

(6) If the District Magistrate finds an application given under sub-section (5) to be false or frivolous, he shall by order award to the allottee or the landlord, as the case may be, against the applicant special costs which shall not exceed five hundred rupees.

(7) Every order under this section shall, [subject to any order made under section 18]3 he final.

(8) The allottee shall, [subject to the provisions of sub-sections (5) and 9 and section 18]4, be deemed to become tenant of the building from the date of allotment or, where he is unable to obtain possession by reason of a stay order or of any other person having occupied or continued to occupy the building, from the date on which he obtains possession.

[(9) The District Magistrate shall, while making an order under clause (a) of sub-section (1) also require the allottee to pay to the landlord an advance, equivalent to-

(a) where the building is situated in a hill municipality, one half of the yearly presumptive rent; and

(b) in any other case, one month's presumptive rent and on his failure to make or offer the payment within a week thereof, rescind the allotment order.

Explanation— In this sub-section the expression “presumptive rent” means an amount of rent which the District Magistrate Prima facie considers reasonable having regard to the provisions of sub-section (2) and (2-A) of section 9:

Provided that such amount shall not be less than the amount of rent which was payable by the last tenant, if any.

(10) Nothing in sub-section (9) shall be construed to require the District Magistrate to take any evidence or hold any formal inquiry before fixing the presumptive rent of the building allotted and the amount mentioned in the allotment order as presumptive rent shall be subject to any agreement in writing between the parties or to any subsequent determination of standard rent after formal inquiry under section 9:

Provided that until the presumptive rent is so revised by agreement or by an order under section 9, the tenant shall continue to be liable to pay rent according to the presumptive rent specified in the allotment order, so however, that any subsequent order under section 9 shall relate back to the date of commencement of the tenancy.]5

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Added by section 9 (i) of U. P. Act No. 28 of 1976.
  2. 2.Omitted by section 9 (ii) ibid.
  3. 3.Substituted by section 9 (iii) of U. P. Act No. 28 of 1976.
  4. 4.Subs. by section 9 (iv) ibid.
  5. 5.Subs. by section 9 (v) ibid

Practise questions on Uttar Pradesh Local Laws