Res sub judice
Latin: A matter under judgment
Also called: Rule of res sub judice, Stay of suit
A matter already pending before a court. Under Section 10 of the CPC, a court must not proceed with the trial of a later suit when the same matter is directly and substantially in issue in an earlier pending suit.
Explained
Res sub judice refers to a matter that is pending before a court for decision. The rule is codified in Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: no Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or parties under whom they claim, litigating under the same title, where that suit is pending in the same or any other Court in India having jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in a court beyond India established or continued by the Central Government with like jurisdiction, or before the Supreme Court.
The conditions are cumulative. There must be two suits, one instituted earlier than the other. The matter in issue in the later suit must be directly and substantially in issue in the earlier one, not merely collaterally. The parties must be the same or claim under the same parties, litigating under the same title. The earlier suit must be pending in a court competent to grant the relief claimed in the later suit. The Explanation adds that the pendency of a suit in a foreign court does not preclude Indian courts from trying a suit on the same cause of action.
Section 10 bars only the trial of the later suit, not its institution. The later suit may be filed and kept pending, and the court is not prevented from passing interlocutory orders in it. The object is to prevent courts of concurrent jurisdiction from trying parallel suits on the same issue, and so to avoid conflicting decisions and waste of time.
Res sub judice differs from res judicata under Section 11. Res sub judice concerns a matter still pending and stays the later trial; res judicata concerns a matter already heard and finally decided and bars the later suit or issue. Both rest on the policy that a party should not be vexed twice for the same cause. Examiners test the conditions in Section 10, the foreign court Explanation, and the contrast with Section 11.
What the law says
No Court shall proceed with the trial of any suit in which the matter in issue is also directly and substantially in issue in a previously instituted suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim litigating under the same title where such suit is pending in the same or any other Court in [India] have jurisdiction to grant the relief claimed, or in any Court beyond the limits of [India] established or continued by [the Central Government ***.] and having like jurisdiction, or before [the Supreme Court].
Explanation.—The pendency of a suit in a foreign Court does not preclude the Courts in [India] from trying a suit founded on the same cause of action.
Codifies the rule of res sub judice
No Court shall try any suit or issue in which the matter directly and substantially in issue has been directly and substantially in issue in a former suit between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim, litigating under the same title, in a Court competent to try such subsequent suit or the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised, and has been heard and finally decided by such Court.
Explanation I.—The expression “former suit” shall denote a suit which has been decided prior to a suit in question whether or not it was instituted prior thereto.
Explanation II.—For the purposes of this section, the competence of a Court shall be determined irrespective of any provisions as to a right of appeal from the decision of such Court.
Res judicata, the contrasting rule for decided matters
Example
For example, A sues B in a civil court at Saket, Delhi for a declaration of title to a house in South Delhi. While that suit is pending, B sues A in another competent civil court in Delhi claiming the same house on the same title. The second court must stay the trial of B's suit under Section 10.
For the exam
- Codified in Section 10 CPC; it stays the trial, not the institution, of the later suit.
- The earlier suit must be previously instituted and still pending.
- Same matter directly and substantially in issue; same parties under the same title.
- A suit pending in a foreign court does not bar an Indian suit (Explanation).
- Res judicata (Section 11) applies after a final decision; res sub judice while pending.
4 questions in the Law Maker question bank use this maxim. Practise Civil Procedure Code questions
Related terms
- Res judicataA matter directly and substantially in issue that a competent court has heard and finally decided between the same parties cannot be tried again in a later suit (Section 11, CPC).
- Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causaNo person should be troubled twice for the same cause. The maxim underlies res judicata in civil law and the bar on a second prosecution for the same offence in criminal law.
- DecreeThe formal expression of an adjudication that conclusively determines the rights of the parties on all or any matter in controversy in a suit, as defined in Section 2(2) of the CPC.
- Lis pendensWhile a suit about a right to immovable property is pending, a party cannot transfer the property so as to affect the other party's rights under the eventual decree.
Further reading
Checked 6 November 2026. Statutory text is quoted from the Bare Acts library, taken from India Code. See the full glossary.