Law Maker

CHAPTER III ADMISSION AND ENROLMENT OF ADVOCATES

Section 24A: Disqualification for enrolment

The Advocates Act, 1961

1[(1) No person shall be admitted as an advocate on a State roll―

(a) if he is convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude;

(b) if he is convicted of an offence under the provisions of the Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955 (22 of 1955);

2[(c) if he is dismissed or removed from employment or office under the State on any charge involving moral turpitude.

Explanation.―In this clause, the expression “State” shall have the meaning assigned to it under article 12 of the Constitution:]

Provided that the disqualification for enrolment as aforesaid shall cease to have effect after a period of two years has elapsed since his 3[released or dismissal or, as the case may be, removal.]

(2) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply to a person who having been found guilty is dealt with under the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 (20 of 1958).]

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Ins. by Act 60 of 1973, s. 19 (w.e.f. 31-1-1974).
  2. 2.Ins. by Act 70 of 1993, s. 7 (w.e.f. 26-12-1993).
  3. 3.Subs. by s. 7, ibid., for “release” (w.e.f. 26-12-1993).

Questions on this section

3 questions in 3 of our papers cite Section 24A. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Consider the following statements under Section 24A of the Advocates Act, 1961: 1. A person convicted of an offence under the Untouchability (Offences) Act, 1955 is disqualified for enrolment. 2. A person dismissed from employment by a private company on a charge involving moral turpitude is disqualified for enrolment. 3. The disqualification does not apply to a person who, having been found guilty, is dealt with under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Practise questions on Professional Ethics & BCI Rules