Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.
PART II · CHAPTER II RELEVANCY OF FACTS · Admissions
Section 20: When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
Corresponding Evidence Act provision
As given in the correspondence table of the National Crime Records Bureau (Ministry of Home Affairs). Read both texts before relying on it. NCRB table
Questions on this section
1 question in 8 of our papers cite Section 20. Try these from the free papers:
1. Under Section 20 of the BSA, apart from the case where the genuineness of a document produced is in question, oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant unless and until: