Order VIII Rule 6G: Rules relating to written statement to apply

Questions on this rule

2 questions in 1 of our papers cite Order VIII Rule 6G. Try these from the free papers:

1. 1. Match the Supreme Court judgments of July 2026 (List I) with the provision chiefly interpreted (List II): List I A. A.K. Ghosh & Company v. Biman Bose B. Mahinder v. Puran Singh C. Mahendra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh D. Himanshu Chordia v. State of Rajasthan List II 1. Section 22, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 2. Order VIII Rule 6G, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 3. Section 125(4), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 4. Section 299, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

   A.A-1, B-2, C-4, D-3B.A-2, B-1, C-4, D-3C.A-2, B-1, C-3, D-4D.A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3
   Show answer

2. 2. In A.K. Ghosh & Company v. Biman Bose, decided on 13 July 2026, the Supreme Court considered the time within which a plaintiff in a commercial suit must file a written statement to the defendant's counter-claim. It held that:

   A.the court may extend time beyond 120 days for sufficient cause, since Order VIII Rule 10 does not bind a plaintiffB.the outer limit of 120 days does not apply, since Order VIII Rule 6G CPC governs only the contents of such a pleadingC.the time is governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, since the CPC fixes no period for a reply to a counter-claimD.the outer limit of 120 days in the proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 CPC applies to it by virtue of Order VIII Rule 6G CPC
   Show answer