Law Maker

CHAPTER XXIX APPEALS

Section 374: Appeals from convictions

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (repealed)

Repealed by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (46 of 2023) with effect from 1 July 2024.

(1) Any person convicted on a trial held by a High Court in its extraordinary original criminal jurisdiction may appeal to the Supreme Court.

(2) Any person convicted on a trial held by a Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge or on a trial held by any other court in which a sentence of imprisonment for more than seven years 1[has been passed against him or against any other person convicted at the same trial], may appeal to the High Court.

(3) Save as otherwise provided in sub-section (2), any person,—

(a) convicted on a trial held by a Metropolitan Magistrate or Assistant Sessions Judge or Magistrate of the first class, or of the second class, or

(b) sentenced under section 325, or

(c) in respect of whom an order has been made or a sentence has been passed under section 360 by any Magistrate,

may appeal to the Court of Session.

2[(4) When an appeal has been filed against a sentence passed under section 376, section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB or section 376E of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), the appeal shall be disposed of within a period of six months from the date of filing of such appeal.]

State Amendment (as printed in the official text)

Assam

In Section 374 of the Code, in clause (a) of sub-section (3), for the words “Magistrate of the first class, or of the second class,” the words “Magistrate of the first class, Executive Magistrate or a Magistrate of the second class,” shall be substituted.

[Vide Assam Act 3 of 1984, s. 3(3) and the Schedule.]

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Subs. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 28, for “has been passed” (w.e.f. 18-12-1978).
  2. 2.Ins. by Act 22 of 2018, s. 20 (w.e.f. 21-4-2018).

Now in the BNSS

As given in the correspondence table of the National Crime Records Bureau (Ministry of Home Affairs). Read both texts before relying on it. NCRB table

374. Appeals from convictions.BNSS 415

Questions on this section

1 question in 1 of our papers cite Section 374. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. In Vishnu Kumar Gupta v. State of Madhya Pradesh, decided on 30 July 2026, a Magistrate had acquitted the accused, and the Sessions Court, in appeal, reversed the acquittal and convicted him. The Supreme Court held that the accused's remedy against this conviction is:

Practise questions on Criminal Law