Law Maker

CHAPTER II OF CONTRACTS, VOIDABLE CONTRACTS AND VOID AGREEMENTS

Section 28: Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings, void

The Indian Contract Act, 1872

1[Every agreement,—

(a) by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under or in respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary tribunals, or which limits the time within which he may thus enforce his rights; or

(b) which extinguishes the rights of any party thereto, or discharges any party thereto, from any liability, under or in respect of any contract on the expiry of a specified period so as to restrict any party from enforcing his rights, is void to the extent.]

Exception 1.—Saving of contract to refer to arbitration dispute that may arise.—This section shall not render illegal a contract, by which two or more persons agree that any dispute which may arise between them in respect of any subject or class of subjects shall be referred to arbitration, and that only the amount awarded in such arbitration shall be recoverable in respect of the dispute so referred.

2*****

Exception 2.—Saving of contract to refer questions that have already arisen.—Nor shall this section render illegal any contract in writing, by which two or more persons agree to refer to arbitration any question between them which has already arisen, or affect any provision of any law in force for the time being as to references to arbitration3.

4[Exception 3.—Saving of a guarantee agreement of a bank or a financial institution.—This section shall not render illegal a contract in writing by which any bank or financial institution stipulate a term in a guarantee or any agreement making a provision for guarantee for extinguishment of the rights or discharge of any party thereto from any liability under or in respect of such guarantee or agreement on the expiry of a specified period which is not less than one year from the date of occurring or non-occurring of a specified event for extinguishment or discharge of such party from the said liability.

Explanation.—(i) In Exception 3, the expression “bank” means—

(a) a “banking company” as defined in clause (c) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949(10 of 1949);

(b) “a corresponding new bank” as defined in clause (da) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949(10 of 1949);

(c) “State Bank of India” constituted under section 3 of the State Bank of India Act, 1955 (23 of 1955);

(d) “a subsidiary bank” as defined in clause (k) of section 2 of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959(38 of 1959);

(e) “a Regional Rural Bank” established under section 3 of the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976(21 of 1976);

(f) “a Co-operative Bank” as defined in clause (cci) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949(10 of 1949);

(g) “a multi-State co-operative bank” as defined in clause (cciiia) of section 5 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949(10 of 1949); and

(ii) In Exception 3, the expression “a financial institution” means any public financial institution within the meaning of section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956(1 of 1956).]

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Subs. by Act 1 of 1997, s. 2, for certain words (w.e.f. 8-1-1997).
  2. 2.The second clause of Exception 1 to section 28 rep. by Act 1 of 1877, s. 2 and Sch.
  3. 3.Cf. the Arbitration Act, 1940 (10 of 1940) and the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), s. 389.
  4. 4.Ins. by Act 4 of 2013, s. 17 and the Schedule (w.e.f. 18-1-2013).

Questions on this section

8 questions in 28 of our papers cite Section 28. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. With reference to the exceptions to Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, consider the following statements: 1. A contract by which parties agree that any dispute which may arise between them in future shall be referred to arbitration is not rendered illegal by Section 28. 2. Exception 2 applies to a contract in writing by which parties agree to refer to arbitration a question which has already arisen between them. 3. A term that only the amount awarded in the arbitration shall be recoverable in respect of the dispute referred is void under Section 28. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  2. 2. A contract between X and Y could be sued upon in the Court at Town P and in the Court at Town Q, both of which have jurisdiction. The contract provides that disputes under it shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Court at Town Q only. According to A.B.C. Laminart Pvt. Ltd. v. A.P. Agencies (1989), this clause:

  3. 3. A works contract made in 2022 between two private companies, X Ltd and Y Ltd, provides that if Y Ltd does not file a suit within six months of any breach, all rights of Y Ltd under the contract shall stand extinguished and X Ltd shall stand discharged from liability. Neither company is a bank or a financial institution. Under Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, this clause is:

Practise questions on Contract Law