Law Maker

CHAPTER IV OF THE PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS · Performance of reciprocal promises

Section 55: Effect of failure to perform at fixed time, in contract in which time is essential

The Indian Contract Act, 1872

When a party to a contract promises to do a certain thing at or before a specified time, or certain things at or before specified times, and fails to do any such thing at or before the specified time, the contract, or so much of it as has not been performed, becomes voidable at the option of the promisee, if the intention of the parties was that time should be of the essence of the contract.

Effect of such failure when time is not essential.—If it was not the intention of the parties that time should be of the essence of the contract, the contract does not become voidable by the failure to do such thing at or before the specified time; but the promisee is entitled to compensation from the promisor for any loss occasioned to him by such failure.

Effect of acceptance of performance at time other than that agreed upon.—If, in case of a contract voidable on account of the promisor’s failure to perform his promise at the time agreed, the promisee accepts performance of such promise at any time other than that agreed, the promisee cannot claim compensation for any loss occasioned by the non-performance of the promise at the time agreed, unless, at the time of such acceptance, he gives notice to the promisor of his intention to do so.1

State Amendment (as printed in the official text)

Uttar Pradesh

Amendment of section 55.—In section 55 of the Principal Act, in the third paragraph, for the words “unless at the time of such acceptance he gives notice to the promiser of his intention to do so”, the words “where at the time of such acceptance he has waived his right to do so” shall be substituted.”

[Vide Uttar Pradesh 57 of 1976, s. 26]

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.C.f. ss. 62 and 63, infra.

Questions on this section

4 questions in 18 of our papers cite Section 55. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Under the third paragraph of Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (as it stands in the central Act, leaving aside State amendments), a promisee who accepts performance at a time other than that agreed, in a contract voidable for the promisor's delay, can claim compensation for loss caused by the delay only if:

  2. 2. Consider the following statements under Section 55 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: 1. Where time is of the essence and the promisor fails to perform at the fixed time, the contract, or so much of it as has not been performed, becomes voidable at the option of the promisee. 2. Where time is not of the essence, failure to perform at the fixed time does not make the contract voidable, but the promisee is entitled to compensation for any loss caused by the failure. 3. Whether time is of the essence of a contract depends on the intention of the parties. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Practise questions on Contract Law