Law Maker

CHAPTER IV OF THE PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS · Contracts which need not be performed

Section 63: Promisee may dispense with or remit performance of promisee

The Indian Contract Act, 1872

Every promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly or in part, the performance of the promisee made to him, or may extend the time for such performance1,or may accept instead of it any satisfaction which he thinks fit.

Illustrations

(a) A promises to paint a picture for B. B afterwards forbids him to do so. A is no longer bound to perform the promise.

(b) A owes B 5,000 rupees. A pays to B, and B accepts, in satisfaction of the whole debt, 2,000 rupees paid at the time and place at which the 5,000 rupees were payable. The whole debt is discharged.

(c) A owes B 5,000 rupees. C pays to B 1,000 rupees, and B accepts them, in satisfaction of his claim on A. This payment is a discharge of the whole claim2.

(d) A owes B, under. a contract, a sum of money, the amount of which has not been ascertained. A, without ascertaining the amount, gives to B, and B, in satisfaction thereof, accepts, the sum of 2,000 rupees. This is a discharge of the whole debt, whatever may be its amount.

(e) A owes B 2,000 rupees, and is also indebted to other creditors. A makes an arrangement with his creditors, including B, to pay them a 3[composition] of eight annas in the rupee upon their respective demands. Payment to B of 1,000 rupees is a discharge of B’s demand.

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.But see s. 135, infra.
  2. 2.See s. 41, supra.
  3. 3.Subs. by Act 12 of 1891, s. 2 and the Second Schedule, Pt. I, for “compensation”.

Leading cases

Questions on this section

1 question in 3 of our papers cite Section 63. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Consider the following statements under Section 63 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: 1. A promisee may dispense with or remit, wholly or in part, the performance of the promise made to him. 2. A promisee may extend the time for performance of the promise. 3. A creditor's acceptance of a smaller sum, paid at the time and place fixed, in satisfaction of the whole debt does not discharge the debt unless fresh consideration is given. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Practise questions on Contract Law