Law Maker

CHAPTER XI OF FALSE EVIDENCE AND OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE

Section 228A: Disclosure of identity of the victim of certain offences, etc

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (repealed)

Repealed by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023) with effect from 1 July 2024.

1[(1) Whoever prints or publishes the name or any matter which may make known the identity of any person against whom an 2[offence under section 376, 3[section 376A, section 376AB, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA, section 376DB] or section 376E] is alleged or found to have been committed (hereafter in this section referred to as the victim) shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to fine.

(2) Nothing in sub-section (1) extends to any printing or publication of the name or any matter which may make known the identity of the victim if such printing or publication is—

(a) by or under the order in writing of the officer-in-charge of the police station or the police officer making the investigation into such offence acting in good faith for the purposes of such investigation; or

(b) by, or with the authorisation in writing of, the victim; or

(c) where the victim is dead or minor or of unsound mind, by, or with the authorisation in writing of, the next-of-kin of the victim:

Provided that no such authorisation shall be given by the next-of-kin to anybody other than the chairman or the secretary, by whatever name called, of any recognised welfare institution or organisation.

Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, “recognised welfare institution or organisation” means a social welfare institution or organisation recognised in this behalf by the Central or State Government.

(3) Whoever prints or publishes any matter in relation to any proceeding before a court with respect to an offence referred to in sub-section (1) without the previous permission of such court shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to fine.

Explanation.—The printing or publication of the judgment of any High Court or the Supreme Court does not amount to an offence within the meaning of this section.]

State Amendment (as printed in the official text)

Arunachal Pradesh

Amendment of section 228A.—In section 228A of the Penal Code, in sub-section (1), for the words, figure and letters “offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376B, section 376C or section 376D or section 376E” the words, figure and letters “offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376AA, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D, section 376DA or section 376E” shall be substituted. [Vide Arunachal Pradesh Act 3 of 2019, s. 4]

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Ins. by Act 43 of 1983, s. 2.
  2. 2.Subs. by Act 13 of 2013, s. 4, for “offence under section 376, section 376A, section 376B, section 376C or section 376D” (w.e.f. 3-2-2013).
  3. 3.Subs. by Act 22 of 2018, s. 3, for “section 376A, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D” (w.e.f. 21-4-2018).

Now in the BNS

As given in the correspondence table of the National Crime Records Bureau (Ministry of Home Affairs). Read both texts before relying on it. NCRB table

228A. Disclosure of identity of the victim of certain offences, etc.BNS 72

Questions on this section

1 question in 6 of our papers cite Section 228A. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Consider the following statements with reference to Sections 72 and 73 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 1. Printing the name of a rape victim by, or with the written authorisation of, the victim herself is not an offence under Section 72(1). 2. Where the victim is dead, her next of kin may authorise any newspaper in writing to publish her name. 3. Printing or publishing the judgment of a High Court or of the Supreme Court in such a case does not amount to an offence under Section 73. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Practise questions on Criminal Law