Law Maker

CHAPTER XVIII OF OFFENCES RELATING TO DOCUMENTSAND TO PROPERTY MARKS

Section 469: Forgery for purpose of harming reputation

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (repealed)

Repealed by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (45 of 2023) with effect from 1 July 2024.

Whoever commits forgery, 1[intending that the document or electronic record forged] shall harm the reputation of any party, or knowing that it is likely to be used for that purpose, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Subs. by s. 91, and the First Sch., ibid., “intending that the document forged” (w.e.f. 17-10-2000).

Now in the BNS

As given in the official comparison tables of the Bureau of Police Research and Development and the Allahabad High Court (the NCRB table has no row for it). Read both texts before relying on it.

IPC 469BNS 336(4)

Questions on this section

1 question in 5 of our papers cite Section 469. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Consider the following statements under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023: 1. Forgery committed with the intention that the forged document shall be used for the purpose of cheating is punishable with imprisonment up to seven years, and fine. 2. Forgery committed with the intention that the forged document shall harm the reputation of any party is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, and fine. 3. Whoever fraudulently uses as genuine a document which he knows to be forged is punished in the same manner as if he had forged it. 4. Forgery simpliciter under Section 336(2) is punishable with imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both. Which of the statements given above are correct?

Practise questions on Criminal Law