Domestic relationship
A relationship between two persons who live or have at any time lived together in a shared household, related by consanguinity, marriage, a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption, or as joint family members.
Explained
Section 2(f) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 defines domestic relationship as a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family. It is the gateway to the Act: an aggrieved person under Section 2(a) is a woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and alleges domestic violence by the respondent.
Two elements are required. First, the parties must live, or have at some time lived, together in a shared household; past cohabitation is enough, so a woman who has been driven out can still invoke the Act. Second, the relationship must fall within one of the listed categories. A relationship in the nature of marriage covers some live-in relationships, but the courts have held that not every live-in arrangement qualifies; it must resemble marriage in its essentials, such as the parties holding themselves out as spouses and living together for a significant period.
The definition links with other provisions. A shared household under Section 2(s) is one where the aggrieved person lives or has lived in a domestic relationship. In Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja (2020) the Supreme Court held that a shared household need not belong to the husband or his joint family, so a house owned by the husband's relative where she lived in a domestic relationship can qualify. Section 17 gives every woman in a domestic relationship a right to reside in the shared household. In Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora (2016) the words adult male in Section 2(q) were struck down, so a woman or a non-adult in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person can be a respondent.
Section 2(1)(e) of the POCSO Act, 2012 adopts the same meaning. Examiners ask which relationship falls outside Section 2(f) and test the shared household cases.
What the law says
(f) “domestic relationship” means a relationship between two persons who live or have, at any point of time, lived together in a shared household, when they are related by consanguinity, marriage, or through a relationship in the nature of marriage, adoption or are family members living together as a joint family;
Section 2(f) defines domestic relationship; 2(a), 2(q), 2(s)
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, every woman in a domestic relationship shall have the right to reside in the shared household, whether or not she has any right, title or beneficial interest in the same.
(2) The aggrieved person shall not be evicted or excluded from the shared household or any part of it by the respondent save in accordance with the procedure established by law.
Right to reside in the shared household
(e) “domestic relationship” shall have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (f) of section 2 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (43 of 2005);
Section 2(1)(e) adopts the PWDVA meaning
For the exam
- Section 2(f) PWDVA: shared household plus a listed relationship.
- Past cohabitation suffices: 'live or have, at any point of time, lived together'.
- Covers relationships in the nature of marriage, not every live-in arrangement.
- After Hiral Harsora (2016) a respondent need not be an adult male.
- POCSO Act Section 2(1)(e) borrows this definition.
14 questions in the Law Maker question bank use this term. Practise Family Law questions
Judgments
- Satish Chander Ahuja v. Sneha Ahuja (2020)A shared household under Section 2(s) of the Domestic Violence Act need not belong to the husband or his joint family; S.R. Batra v. Taruna Batra was held not good law, and the owner's civil suit was remanded for trial.
- Hiral P. Harsora v. Kusum Narottamdas Harsora (2016)The words 'adult male' in the definition of 'respondent' in Section 2(q) of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 violate Article 14 and were struck down, so women and non-adults can be respondents; the proviso became otiose.
Related terms
- Shared householdUnder Section 2(s) of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, a household where the aggrieved woman lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship, whoever owns it, including a joint family household.
- Aggrieved personUnder Section 2(a) of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and alleges that the respondent subjected her to domestic violence.
- Protection orderAn order made by a Magistrate under Section 18 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 prohibiting the respondent from committing domestic violence and related acts. Section 2(o) of that Act.
- Protection OfficerAn officer appointed by the State Government under Section 8(1) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, who assists the Magistrate and helps the aggrieved woman obtain relief.
- CrueltyFor Section 85 of the BNS, cruelty means wilful conduct likely to drive a woman to suicide or gravely endanger her life, limb or health, or harassment to coerce her or her relatives to meet an unlawful demand.
Further reading
Checked 6 November 2026. Statutory text is quoted from the Bare Acts library, taken from India Code. See the full glossary.