Law Maker

PART VI THE STATES · CHAPTER V.— THE HIGH COURTS IN THE STATES

Article 226: Power of High Courts to issue certain writs

The Constitution of India

1[(1) Notwithstanding anything in article 32 2***, every High Court shall have power, throughout the territories in relation to which it exercises jurisdiction, to issue to any person or authority, including in appropriate cases, any Government, within those territories directions, orders or writs, including 3[writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by Part III and for any other purpose.]

(2) The power conferred by clause (1) to issue directions, orders or writs to any Government, authority or person may also be exercised by any High Court exercising jurisdiction in relation to the territories within which the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises for the exercise of such power, notwithstanding that the seat of such Government or authority or the residence of such person is not within those territories.

4[(3) Where any party against whom an interim order, whether by way of injunction or stay or in any other manner, is made on, or in any proceedings relating to, a petition under clause (1), without—

(a) furnishing to such party copies of such petition and all documents in support of the plea for such interim order; and

(b) giving such party an opportunity of being heard, makes an application to the High Court for the vacation of such order and furnishes a copy of such application to the party in whose favour such order has been made or the counsel of such party, the High Court shall dispose of the application within a period of two weeks from the date on which it is received or from the date on which the copy of such application is so furnished, whichever is later, or where the High Court is closed on the last day of that period, before the expiry of the next day afterwards on which the High Court is open; and if the application is not so disposed of, the interim order shall, on the expiry of that period, or, as the case may be, the expiry of the said next day, stand vacated.]

5[(4) The power conferred on a High Court by this article shall not be in derogation of the power conferred on the Supreme Court by clause (2) of article 32.]

Footnotes in the official text

  1. 1.Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act, 1976, s. 38 for art. 226 (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
  2. 2.The words, figures and letters "but subject to the provisions of article 131A and article 226A" omitted by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 7 (w.e.f. 13-4-1978).
  3. 3.Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 30, for the portion beginning with "writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, or any of them" and ending with "such illegality has resulted in substantial failure of justice." (w.e.f. 1-8- 1979).
  4. 4.Subs. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s.30, for cls. (3), (4), (5) and (6) (w.e.f. 1-8- 1979).
  5. 5.Cl. (7) renumbered as cl. (4) by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 30 (w.e.f. 1-8- 1979).

Leading cases

Showing 12 of 15 judgments in the library on this provision, larger Benches first. Search the judgments

Questions on this article

55 questions in 94 of our papers cite Article 226. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. In State of Orissa v. Dr. (Miss) Binapani Dei (1967), the State refixed a government servant's date of birth and retired her compulsorily, without disclosing the enquiry report or letting her meet the evidence. The Supreme Court held that:

  2. 2. Consider the following statements about Ajay Vijh v. Indian Banks Association (7 July 2026): 1. The Court held the writ petition not maintainable because the Indian Banks' Association is not 'State' under Article 12. 2. The Court said the Caution List is meant for cases of fraud, dishonesty, criminality or other serious misconduct affecting the banking system. 3. The Court directed the Bar Council of India to constitute a team to consider establishing a National Legal Academy for lawyers. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

  3. 3. Which statement correctly compares Article 32 and Article 226?

Practise questions on Constitutional Law