Law Maker

PART XI RELATIONS BETWEEN THE UNION AND THE STATES · CHAPTER II.— ADMINISTRATIVE RELATIONS · Disputes relating to Waters

Article 262: Adjudication of disputes relating to waters of inter-State rivers or river valleys

The Constitution of India

(1) Parliament may by law provide for the adjudication of any dispute or complaint with respect to the use, distribution or control of the waters of, or in, any inter-State river or river valley.

(2) Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, Parliament may by law provide that neither the Supreme Court nor any other court shall exercise jurisdiction in respect of any such dispute or complaint as is referred to in clause (1).

Questions on this article

7 questions in 20 of our papers cite Article 262. Try these from the free papers:

  1. 1. Parliament has enacted a law under Article 262 providing that neither the Supreme Court nor any other court shall exercise jurisdiction in respect of disputes over the use, distribution or control of the waters of inter-State rivers. State A then files an original suit against State B in the Supreme Court under Article 131, seeking a declaration of its share in the waters of an inter-State river. The suit is:

  2. 2. Consider the following statements: 1. Where a State incurs extra costs in carrying out a direction under Article 257(2) or (3), the sum payable by the Government of India is, in default of agreement, determined by an arbitrator appointed by the Chief Justice of India. 2. Parliament may by law provide that neither the Supreme Court nor any other court shall exercise jurisdiction in respect of a dispute relating to the waters of an inter-State river. 3. Final judgments or orders of civil courts in any part of India are capable of execution anywhere within the territory of India according to law. 4. An Inter-State Council under Article 263 can be established only by a law made by Parliament. Which of the statements given above are correct?

Practise questions on Constitutional Law