The State shall regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties and, in particular, the State shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health.
PART IV DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY
Article 47: Duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living and to improve public health
Leading cases
- Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (1994)A citizen has no fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) to trade or do business in potable liquor; the State may prohibit it completely, create a monopoly in itself, and impose restrictions even by subordinate legislation.
- State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara (1951)The Court upheld the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 as within provincial competence over intoxicating liquors, striking down only its bans on medicinal and toilet preparations containing alcohol, on 'commending' intoxicants and certain other severable provisions.
- Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996)The Court held that the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle are part of Indian environmental law, and directed an authority under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to assess and recover compensation from polluting tanneries in Tamil Nadu.
- Municipal Council, Ratlam v. Vardhichand (1980)A municipality cannot plead lack of funds to escape its statutory duty to provide sanitation; a Magistrate under Section 133 CrPC must order abatement of a public nuisance and may give specific, time-bound directions to a public body.
Questions on this article
4 questions in 10 of our papers cite Article 47. Try these from the free papers:
1. Article 47 directs the State to endeavour to bring about prohibition of the consumption of intoxicating drinks and of drugs which are injurious to health, except for:
2. In Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka (1995), a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held, in relation to trade in potable liquor, that: